Associations between hyperacusis and psychosocial work factors in the general population
![kitchen 731351 340](/assets/News/2019/01/kitchen-731351-340__FillWzM2MCwyMDNd.jpg)
Purpose
We investigated the association between hyperacusis and aspects of psychosocial work environment in a general population. The objectives were to investigate (1) prevalence and characteristics (among age, sex, access to social support at home, education, smoking, physical exercise, and perceived general health) of hyperacusis in a general working population and (2) associations between hyperacusis and psychosocial factors in the work environment. The psychosocial work aspects included effort, reward, overcommitment, worry, and social and emotional support.
Methods
Using data from a sample stratified for age and sex from the Österbotten Environmental Health Study in Finland, currently employed participants with self-reported hyperacusis and referents were compared on questionnaire instruments quantifying six aspects of their psychosocial work environment.
Results
Among 856 currently employed participants, 47 constituted a hyperacusis group and 809 a reference group. The hyperacusis group scored significantly higher than the referents on worry at work, social support at work, and reward at work, but not on emotional support at work, work overcommitment, or effort at work. About 40% of the hyperacusis group scored on the upper quartile of the three former work environment factors, with odds ratios ranging from 1.91 to 2.56.
Conclusions
The results suggest that worrying about aspects at work, perceiving low social support, and not perceiving being rewarded at work are associated with hyperacusis.
Full version (open access) of International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, January 2019, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 59–65 available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00420-018-1356-x
Picture: Pixabay.com